Open Budget Survey 2021

8th Edition Summary

Download Global Report  

The Open Budget Survey is the world’s only comparative, independent, and regular assessment of transparency, oversight and participation in national budgets in 120 countries.

As is the case in every round, the 2021 survey represents the collective work of our global network of researchers in each country. This round, however, we did something different. We leaned into partnership and worked hand-in-hand with a select group of partners to co-author our global report and seven regional reports. This new approach has allowed us to benefit from the rich insights of our global partners and present key recommendations to spur action at the global, regional and country level.

Key Takeaways

20%

Since 2008, transparency scores have increased more than 20 percent.

31%

of countries provide sufficiently detailed information to understand how their budget addresses poverty.

14%

of governments present their expenditures by gender.

8

Only eight countries worldwide have formal channels to engage underserved communities in budget processes.

The 2021 survey comes at a time when accountable and inclusive public budgets are more urgent than ever.

Nilawati, an Indonesian fisherwoman and member of the budget group KNTI, shows Alan Frendy Koropitan, a national government official from the Presidential Staff Office, the day-to-day challenges fisherfolk face.

The 2021 survey comes at a time when accountable and inclusive public budgets are more urgent than ever. The pandemic has led to the first rise in global extreme poverty in a generation, inequality is soaring and democracy is backsliding. The wealthy have become wealthier, while the excluded, especially women and marginalized communities are bearing the brunt of the fallout. Governments need to open up to public dialogue around how best to manage scarce public resources if we are to meet these challenges. Inclusion can yield democratic and development dividends in this time of great need and great disruption.

If there is one common theme in this latest Open Budget Survey, it is that reform is possible anywhere.

Over the last 13 years, we have documented steady gains in global transparency. The average transparency score in the survey has increased more by than 20 percent since 2008.
20%
Since 2008, transparency scores have increased more than 20 percent.

Eastern Europe and Central Asia, East Asia and the Pacific, Latin America and the Caribbean and Sub-Saharan Africa (after a dip in the OBS 2017) have all made significant strides in regional transparency scores since 2008. These gains are much needed as we know that fiscal openness lead to lower borrowing costs, higher revenue generation and greater public trust that governments can deliver on the urgent challenges we face.

Somewhat surprisingly in this round of the survey, we found that while accountability systems around the world remain weak, the pandemic did not undo hard-fought gains in transparent and accountable budgeting practices worldwide. Most countries were able to maintain, and in some cases build on earlier gains in their annual budget processes. Between 2019 and 2021, the global average score for transparency increased by 1 point; the global average score for oversight declined by 1 point; and the global average score for participation was unchanged.

The pandemic did not undo hard-fought gains in transparent and accountable budgeting practices worldwide.

Although the survey does not explicitly examine the reasons why country practices improve or regress, we believe the resilience of open budget agendas can be attributed to two factors: increased digitization of information and the institutionalization of accountability practices. These results affirm that investing in open budgets is a winning proposition.

Reform champions worldwide illustrate the power of political will in driving progress. The Dominican Republic has entered the top 10 performers who are leading the way in advancing and institutionalizing transparency alongside others like Georgia. South Korea is spearheading inclusive practices for public consultation in the budget process. Benin, Nigeria and the Gambia are among the biggest improvers in this survey round. These countries are reaping the benefits of open budgets and provide a useful roadmap for others to follow.

Innovative Approaches

While few countries provide meaningful opportunities for people to participate in budgetary processes, we see innovations that illustrate what is possible. 

Nilawati, an Indonesian fisherwoman and member of the budget group KNTI, shows Alan Frendy Koropitan, a national government offical from the Presidential Staff Office, the day-to-day challenges fisherfolk face.

Portals for the people

Increasingly, governments are using digital tools to engage with citizens. For instance, Indonesia set up a centralized portal for complaints related to service delivery. Georgia’s finance ministry updated its online portal to seek inputs on people’s priorities for the upcoming budget. In South Africa, the National Treasury introduced pre-budget consultations. All submissions were posted on the Treasury portal and informed the Treasury’s proposed budget strategy described in South Africa’s Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement.

Colleagues work together at the Ministry of Interior and Safety office in Sejong, Republic of Korea. / © OGP

Building inclusion​

While some countries have mechanisms for public participation, few are open to everyone and even fewer prioritize marginalized communities. South Korea’s Citizen Committee is the exception. It deliberates and filters proposals submitted online before the public votes for which proposals the legislature should fund. In recent years, the Committee expanded to include 150 new members. Out of 450 members, 400 people are now from the general public and 50 from marginalized groups.

 
In Argentina auditors have worked with groups to ensure the government prioritizes and spends funds targeted at people living with Chagas. / © ACIJ

Auditors’ outreach​

Many national audit offices are seeing the benefits of collaborating with civil society. Several are breaking traditional ways of working and leveraging technology to bring in the public.

In Argentina, auditors have worked with groups to ensure the government adequately prioritizes and spends funds targeted at people living with Chagas. Romania’s national audit office provided clear instructions on its website to seek public feedback on its audit programs. Ghana’s Audit Service launched a mobile app, where the public can contribute to audit plans and programs.

Nevertheless, important gaps remain in accountability systems worldwide. No country meets our minimum standards for adequate accountability on the three measures we assess.
In OBS 2021, the global average transparency score is 45 out of 100, far from the level of information the public needs to engage in meaningful debates on how public resources are raised and spent. Nearly three-fourths of the surveyed countries score at insufficient levels of budget transparency. Less than a third of countries provide sufficiently detailed information to understand how their budgets address poverty and only 14 percent present their expenditures by gender.
3/4
Nearly three-fourths of the surveyed countries score at insufficient levels of budget transparency.
Public participation is anemic. Budgets remain a primarily elite conversation with few avenues for ordinary people to engage and have a say. The average global score for participation is just 14 out of 100, indicating that participation is scarce and meaningful participation is rare. Only four countries (South Korea, the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Georgia) offer moderate opportunities for public participation. While some countries engage with the public when formulating or approving budgets, very few do so during implementation and oversight phases. Only 8 countries worldwide have formal channels to engage underserved communities.

Oversight systems are being compromised. The average score for legislative oversight has declined 2 points to 47 out of 100 due to political unrest, the pandemic and executive overreach. In 17 countries, legislative oversight is lower in 2021 compared to 2017. Some executive governments have found ways to undermine Supreme Audit Institutions while staying within the boundaries of the law. One-third of legislatures failed to examine audit reports. In nearly two out of three surveyed countries, the SAI or the legislature do not publicly track actions by the executive to address audit recommendations.

In 17 countries, legislative oversight is lower in 2021 compared to 2017.

That is why we are renewing our call to action and urging governments to publicly commit to and achieve the following goals:
  1. Renew the social contract by establishing meaningful, inclusive opportunities to engage the public across the budget process.
  2. Curtail executive overreach and abuse by improving oversight, especially during budget execution, from legislatures and independent auditors.
  3. Usher in a race to the top by disclosing more and better information on planned and executed budgets and debt and fiscal risks. We recognize many countries will need technical assistance to do so and urge donors to ramp up assistance.
  4. Institutionalize accountability reforms as permanent features of budget systems.

The status quo is not enough but we also know there are bright spots that show progress is within reach. As we look ahead, we must ask ourselves, what can we as a network of open budget champions do to encourage more countries to pursue paths to progress?

Global Report Authors
Anjali Garg

Anjali Garg

International Budget Partnership

www.internationalbudget.org

Renzo Lavin

Renzo Lavin

Independent Researcher

@renlavin

Chivimbiso Maponga

Chivimbiso Maponga

Independent Researcher

www.linkedin.com/in/chimbi-maponga-cdfa-aa955953
Regional Reports
Regional Report
Afrique francophone
Regional Report
América Latina y el Caribe
Regional Report
Centroamérica
Regional Report
Eastern Europe and Central Asia
Regional Report
South Asia
Regional Report
Southeast Asia and the Pacific
Regional Report
Sub-Saharan Africa
Regional Report Authors
Charlie Martial Ngounou

Charlie Martial Ngounou

Afrique francophone

www.afroleadership.org

Eric Djazet

Eric Djazet

Afrique francophone

www.afroleadership.org
Pierre Nka

Pierre Nka

Afrique francophone

www.afroleadership.org

Julieta Izcurdia

Julieta Izcurdia

América Latina y el Caribe

@ACIJargentina

Ricardo Barrientos

Ricardo Barrientos

Centroamérica

@ICEFI

Ricardo Castaneda

Ricardo Castaneda

Centroamérica

@ICEFI

Carlos Melgar

Carlos Melgar

Centroamérica

@ICEFI

Abelardo  Medina

Abelardo Medina

Centroamérica

@ICEFI

Jonathan Menkos

Jonathan Menkos

Centroamérica

@ICEFI

Lourdes Molina

Lourdes Molina

Centroamérica

@ICEFI

Tatiana Savva

Tatiana Savva

Eastern Europe & Central Asia

https://www.expert-grup.org/ro

Udahiruni Atapattu

Udahiruni Atapattu

South Asia

www.veriteresearch.org

Yasmin Raji

Yasmin Raji

South Asia

www.veriteresearch.org

Hafsa Haniffa

Hafsa Haniffa

South Asia

www.veriteresearch.org

Deshal de Mel

Deshal de Mel

South Asia

www.veriteresearch.org

Alissa Marianne Rode

Alissa Marianne Rode

Southeast Asia & the Pacific

@IDEASMalaysia

Matthew Cummins

Matthew Cummins

Sub-Saharan Africa

www.unicef.org/esa

Press release

Arabic

Download

English

Download

French

Download

Russian

Download

Spanish

Download

TAKE ACTION

A Call to Open Budgets

Join us and our many international and national partners to urge governments to:

  1. Establish meaningful, inclusive spaces to engage the public in budget processes.
  2. Curtail executive overreach and empower legislators and auditors’ oversight roles.
  3. Disclose more and better budget information.
  4. Sustain progress by institutionalizing accountability reforms.

Add your voice