Slovakia

Which countries lead in budget accountability? Which ones need improvement? Explore our data and recommendations for each of the 120 countries assessed.
Open Budget Survey Results

Public Participation

22

Budget Oversight

56

Transparency

65

Open Budget Survey 2021

Government budget decisions – what taxes to levy, what services to provide, and how much debt to take on – have important consequences for all people in society. When governments provide information and meaningful channels for the public to engage in these decisions, we can better ensure public money is spent on public interests.

Read more

 

The Open Budget Survey (OBS) is the world’s only independent, comparative and fact-based research instrument that uses internationally accepted criteria to assess public access to central government budget information; formal opportunities for the public to participate in the national budget process; and the role of budget oversight institutions, such as legislatures and national audit offices, in the budget process.

The survey helps local civil society assess and confer with their government on the reporting and use of public funds. This 8th edition of the OBS covers 120 countries.

Summary
Country Specific Assessments
Country summary EN
pdf, 315.67 KB
Questionnaire EN
pdf, 909.74 KB
65 /100

This part of the OBS measures public access to information on how the central government raises and spends public resources. It assesses the online availability, timeliness, and comprehensiveness of eight key budget documents using 109 equally weighted indicators and scores each country on a scale of 0 to 100. A transparency score of 61 or above indicates a country is likely publishing enough material to support informed public debate on the budget.

Transparency in Slovakia compared to others

Global Average
45
OECD Average
66
Bulgaria
71
Moldova
65
Ukraine
65
Slovakia
65
Romania
63
Poland
60
Czech Republic
60
Hungary
44
0
Insufficient
61
Sufficient
100

Slovakia’s ranking: 24 of 120 countries

0
100

How has the transparency score for Slovakia changed over time?

57
2010
67
2012
57
2015
59
2017
60
2019
65
2021
0
Insufficient
61
Sufficient
100

Public availability of budget documents in Slovakia

Key
Available to the Public
Published Late, or Not Published Online, or Produced for Internal Use Only
Not Produced
Scroll
Document 2010 2012 2015 2017 2019 2021
Pre-Budget Statement
Executive’s Budget Proposal
Enacted Budget
Citizens Budget
In-Year Reports
Mid-Year Review
Year-End Report
Audit Report

How comprehensive is the content of the key budget documents that Slovakia makes available to the public?

Key
61-100 / 100
41-60 / 100
1-40 / 100
Scroll
Key budget document Document purpose and contents Fiscal year assessed Document content score
Pre-Budget Statement Discloses the broad parameters of fiscal policies in advance of the Executive's Budget Proposal; outlines the government's economic forecast, anticipated revenue, expenditures, and debt. 2021 72
Executive’s Budget Proposal Submitted by the executive to the legislature for approval; details the sources of revenue, the allocations to ministries, proposed policy changes, and other information important for understanding the country's fiscal situation. 2021 76
Enacted Budget The budget that has been approved by the legislature. 2021 95
Citizens Budget A simpler and less technical version of the government's Executive’s Budget Proposal or the Enacted Budget, designed to convey key information to the public. 2021 42
In-Year Reports Include information on actual revenues collected, actual expenditures made, and debt incurred at different intervals; issued quarterly or monthly. 2020 63
Mid-Year Review A comprehensive update on the implementation of the budget as of the middle of the fiscal year; includes a review of economic assumptions and an updated forecast of budget outcomes. 2020 Not Produced
Year-End Report Describes the situation of the government's accounts at the end of the fiscal year and, ideally, an evaluation of the progress made toward achieving the budget's policy goals. 2019 67
Audit Report Issued by the supreme audit institution, this document examines the soundness and completeness of the government's year-end accounts. 2019 48

Slovakia’s transparency score of 65 in the OBS 2021 is near its score in 2019.

Recommendations

Slovakia should prioritize the following actions to improve budget transparency:

Produce and publish the Mid-Year Review online in a timely manner.
Make the process of producing a Citizens Budget more inclusive, by introducing an accessible and citizen-friendly mechanism to identify the public’s requirements for budget information to be included in such a document. Slovakia should also encourage citizens' engagement in the budget process by producing "citizens" versions of key budget documents throughout the four phases of the budget cycle.
Improve the coverage of the Audit Report, by auditing greater percentages of on-budget expenditures and extra-budgetary funds within the mandate of the Supreme Audit Office. In addition, to strengthen the overall auditing process and visibility, the Supreme Audit Office or the National Council should release a report tracking actions taken by the executive to respond to audit recommendations; and the executive should report publicly on steps it has taken to address audit findings.
22 /100

The OBS assesses the formal opportunities offered to the public for meaningful participation in the different stages of the budget process. It examines the practices of the central government’s executive, the legislature, and the supreme audit institution (SAI) using 18 equally weighted indicators, aligned with the Global Initiative for Fiscal Transparency’s Principles of Public Participation in Fiscal Policies , and scores each country on a scale from 0 to 100.

Slovakia has a public participation score of 22 (out of 100).

Public participation in Slovakia compared to others

Global Average
14
OECD Average
21
Ukraine
39
Bulgaria
26
Slovakia
22
Poland
22
Czech Republic
15
Moldova
11
Romania
7
Hungary
0
0
Insufficient
61
Sufficient
100

For more information, see here  for innovative public participation practices around the world.

Extent of opportunities for public participation in the budget process

27
/100
Formulation
(executive)
0
/100
Approval
(legislature)
0
/100
Implementation
(executive)
67
/100
Audit
(supreme audit institution)
Key
0-40: Few
41-60: Limited
61-100: Adequate

Recommendations

Slovakia's Ministry of Finance has established pre-budget deliberations during budget formulation but, to further strengthen public participation in the budget process, should also prioritize the following actions:

Expand mechanisms during budget formulation to engage any civil society organization or member of the public who wishes to participate - at the moment, the committees that allow for public participation include only technical bodies and select participants such as the Council of Budget Responsibility, the Institute of Informatics and Statistics, the National Bank of Slovakia, the Slovak Academy of Sciences, and some private banks.
Pilot mechanisms to monitor budget implementation.
Actively engage with vulnerable and underrepresented communities, directly or through civil society organizations representing them.

Slovakia's National Council should prioritize the following actions:

Allow members of the public or civil society organizations to testify during its hearings on the budget proposal prior to its approval.
Allow members of the public or civil society organizations to testify during its hearings on the Audit Report.
56 /100

The OBS examines the role that legislatures and supreme audit institutions (SAIs) play in the budget process and the extent to which they provide oversight; each country is scored on a scale from 0 to 100 based on 18 equally weighted indicators. In addition, the survey collects supplementary information on independent fiscal institutions (see Box).

The legislature and supreme audit institution in Slovakia, together, provide limited oversight during the budget process, with a composite oversight score of 56 (out of 100). Taken individually, the extent of each institution’s oversight is shown below:

Legislative oversight

0
42
100
limited

Audit oversight

0
83
100
adequate
Key
0-40: Few
41-60: Limited
61-100: Adequate

Recommendations

Slovakia's National Council provides adequate oversight during the planning stage of the budget cycle and weak oversight during the implementation stage. To improve oversight, the following actions should be prioritized:

Legislative committees should examine the Executive’s Budget Proposal and publish reports with their analysis online.
In practice, ensure the legislature is consulted before the executive shifts funds specified in the Enacted Budget between administrative units; spends any unanticipated revenue; or reduces spending due to revenue shortfalls during the budget year.
A legislative committee should examine in-year budget implementation as well as the Audit Report, and publish reports with their findings online.

The emerging practice of establishing independent fiscal institutions

Slovakia’s independent fiscal institution (IFI) is the Council for Budget Responsibility (CBR). Its independence is set in law, and it reports to the executive. It publishes its own macroeconomic and fiscal forecasts, and its own cost estimates of some new policy proposals.

The indicators on IFIs are not scored in the Open Budget Survey.

Methodology

  • Only documents published and events, activities, or developments that took place through 31 December 2020 were assessed in the OBS 2021.
     
  • The survey is based on a questionnaire completed in each country by an independent budget expert:
    Peter Golias
    INEKO
    Bajkalská 25, 827 18 Bratislava, Slovakia
    [email protected]
  • To further strengthen the research, each country’s draft questionnaire is also reviewed by an anonymous independent expert, and in Slovakia by a representative of the Ministry of Finance.
Past reports
Years
Language
Country summary EN
PDF, en
Questionnaire EN
PDF, en
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN