Country Results  | View this page in:

North Macedonia

Which countries lead in budget openness and accountability? Which ones need improvement? Explore our data and recommendations for every assessed country.
Previous Years
2021 | 2023
Open Budget Survey Results

Transparency

39

Public Participation

9

Oversight

57

View Regional Report

Open Budget Survey 2025

Government budget decisions – what taxes to levy, what services to provide, and how much debt to take on – have important consequences for all people in society. When governments provide information and meaningful channels for the public to engage in these decisions, we can better ensure public money is spent on public interests.

Read more

 

The Open Budget Survey (OBS) is the world’s only independent, comparative and fact-based research instrument that uses internationally accepted criteria to assess public access to central government budget information; formal opportunities for the public to participate in the national budget process; and the role of budget oversight institutions, such as legislatures and national audit offices, in the budget process.

The survey helps local civil society assess and confer with their government on the reporting and use of public funds. This 10th edition of the OBS covers 82 countries.

Summary
Country Specific Assessments
Country summary EN
pdf, 249.35 KB
Questionnaire EN
pdf, 886.32 KB
39 /100

This part of the OBS measures public access to information on how the central government raises and spends public resources. It assesses the online availability, timeliness, and comprehensiveness of eight key budget documents using 109 equally weighted indicators and scores each country on a scale of 0 to 100. A transparency score of 61 or above indicates that a country is publishing a sufficient volume of budget information, and that this information provides meaningful coverage of core fiscal data, enabling the public to understand government budget decisions and supporting informed public debate on fiscal policy.

Transparency in North Macedonia compared to others

Global Average
45
Average - Western Balkans & Türkiye
52
Türkiye
65
Albania
64
Croatia
62
Kosovo
57
Montenegro
54
Serbia
53
North Macedonia
39
Bosnia and Herzegovina
30
0
Insufficient
61
Sufficient
100

How has the transparency score for North Macedonia changed over time?

35
2015
37
2017
41
2019
36
2021
35
2023
39
2025
0
Insufficient
61
Sufficient
100

Public availability of budget documents in North Macedonia

Key
Available to the Public
Published Late, or Not Published Online, or Produced for Internal Use Only
None
Scroll
Document 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025
Pre-Budget Statement
Executive’s Budget Proposal
Enacted Budget
Citizens Budget
In-Year Reports
Mid-Year Review
Year-End Report
Audit Report

How comprehensive is the content of the key budget documents that North Macedonia makes available to the public?

Key
61-100 / 100
41-60 / 100
1-40 / 100
Scroll
Key budget document Document purpose and contents Fiscal year assessed Document content score
Pre-Budget Statement Discloses the broad parameters of fiscal policies in advance of the Executive's Budget Proposal; outlines the government's economic forecast, anticipated revenue, expenditures, and debt. 2025 Published Late
Executive’s Budget Proposal Submitted by the executive to the legislature for approval; details the sources of revenue, the allocations to ministries, proposed policy changes, and other information important for understanding the country's fiscal situation. 2025 39
Enacted Budget The budget that has been approved by the legislature. 2025 95
Citizens Budget A simpler and less technical version of the government's Executive’s Budget Proposal or the Enacted Budget, designed to convey key information to the public. 2025 Not Produced
In-Year Reports Include information on actual revenues collected, actual expenditures made, and debt incurred at different intervals; issued quarterly or monthly. 2024 41
Mid-Year Review A comprehensive update on the implementation of the budget as of the middle of the fiscal year; includes a review of economic assumptions and an updated forecast of budget outcomes. 2024 Not Produced
Year-End Report Describes the situation of the government's accounts at the end of the fiscal year and, ideally, an evaluation of the progress made toward achieving the budget's policy goals. 2023 55
Audit Report Issued by the supreme audit institution, this document examines the soundness and completeness of the government's year-end accounts. 2023 71

North Macedonia’s transparency score of 39 in the OBS 2025 is near its score in 2023.

Recommendations

North Macedonia should prioritize the following actions to improve budget transparency:

Publish the Pre-Budget Statement online in a timely manner. This means at least one month before the Executive’s Budget Proposal is submitted to the legislature for consideration.
Produce and publish the Citizens Budget and Mid-Year Review online in a timely manner.
Include in the Executive's Budget Proposal more comprehensive multi-year projections (including BY+2 estimates) and information on fiscal risks. This should encompass improved reporting on quasi-fiscal activities, contingent liabilities, expenditure arrears, public assets, earmarked revenues, fiscal sustainability, and forward-looking policy and priority information, as well as the inclusion of long-term fiscal sustainability analysis and multi-year revenue projections.
Include in the Year-End Report more comprehensive policy and performance information, data on debt, and macroeconomic forecast data. Moreover, the disclosure of information should be strengthened by including comparisons between planned nonfinancial outcomes and actual outcomes, comparisons between projected borrowing estimates and actual outcomes, comparisons between original macroeconomic forecasts and actual outcomes, and original levels of funds for policies impacting the most impoverished and actual amounts.
Strengthen the comprehensiveness of In-Year Reports by providing more detailed information on debt composition, program-level expenditures, and updated outturns and projections for both revenue and expenditure.
The Audit report should be further strengthened by reporting on the steps taken by the executive to address audit recommendations .
9 /100

The OBS assesses the extent to which governments provide formal and meaningful opportunities for public participation across the different stages of the budget process. It examines participation practices used by the central government’s executive (including line ministries), the legislature, and the supreme audit institution (SAI), recognizing that engagement can occur across different institutions. Using 18 equally weighted indicators, the OBS evaluates whether these participation mechanisms are timely, inclusive, transparent, and responsive, in line with the Global Initiative for Fiscal Transparency (GIFT) Principles of Public Participation in Fiscal Policies . Each country is scored on a scale from 0 to 100, reflecting the strength of its formal public participation practices across institutions and throughout the budget process.

North Macedonia has a public participation score of 9 (out of 100).

Public participation in North Macedonia compared to others

Global Average
17
Average - Western Balkans & Türkiye
13
Kosovo
32
Montenegro
22
Albania
17
Croatia
17
North Macedonia
9
Bosnia and Herzegovina
7
Serbia
2
Türkiye
0
0
Insufficient
61
Sufficient
100

For more information, see here  for innovative public participation practices around the world.

Extent of opportunities for public participation in the budget process

0
/100
Formulation
(executive)
0
/100
Approval
(legislature)
0
/100
Implementation
(executive)
56
/100
Audit
(supreme audit institution)
Key
0-40: Few
41-60: Limited
61-100: Adequate

Recommendations

To further strengthen public participation in the budget process, North Macedonia's Ministry of Finance should prioritize the following actions:

Pilot mechanisms to engage the public during budget formulation and to monitor budget implementation.
Actively engage with underrepresented communities, directly or through civil society organizations representing them.

North Macedonia's Assembly should prioritize the following actions:

Allow members of the public and civil society organizations to testify during budget hearings before approval. This participation should be structured to ensure diverse perspectives are heard, enabling the legislature to consider citizen input meaningfully, enhance transparency, and improve the accountability and responsiveness of budget decisions. Clear procedures should be established for submitting testimony, asking questions, and receiving feedback, while making sure marginalized or underrepresented groups are also involved.
Allow members of the public or civil society organizations to testify during its hearings on the Audit Report.
National assembly to organize a hearing upon the SAO report on budget audit, review of government accounts, and follow up on recommendations from SAO.

North Macedonia's State Audit Office has established mechanisms for the public to assist in developing its audit program. It should prioritize the following actions to improve public participation in the budget process:

Establish formal mechanisms for the public to contribute to relevant audit investigations.
57 /100

The OBS examines the role that legislatures and supreme audit institutions (SAIs) play in overseeing the budget process, including how effectively they scrutinize budget proposals, monitor budget implementation and review government accounts. Using 18 equally weighted indicators, the OBS assesses the strength and independence of these oversight institutions and scores each country on a scale from 0 to 100. In addition, the survey collects supplementary information on the existence and role of independent fiscal institutions (IFIs), which can contribute to informed debate and enhanced oversight of fiscal policy (see box below).

The legislature and supreme audit institution in North Macedonia, together, provide limited oversight during the budget process, with a composite oversight score of 57 (out of 100). Taken individually, the extent of each institution’s oversight is shown below:

Legislative oversight

0
53
100
limited

Audit oversight

0
67
100
adequate
Key
0-40: Few
41-60: Limited
61-100: Adequate

Recommendations

North Macedonia's Assembly provides adequate oversight during the planning stage of the budget cycle and weak oversight during the implementation stage. To improve oversight, the following actions should be prioritized:

The Finance and Budget committee should examine in-year budget implementation and publish reports with their findings online.
In practice, ensure the legislature is consulted before the executive spends any unanticipated revenue.
The Finance and Budget Committee should examine the Audit Report and publish a report with their findings online.

To strengthen independence and improve audit oversight by the North Macedonia State Audit Office, the following actions are recommended:

Ensure audit processes are reviewed by an independent agency.

The benefit of establishing independent fiscal institutions

North Macedonia’s independent fiscal institution (IFI) is the Fiscal Council. Its independence is set in law, and it reports to the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia. It publishes its own assessment of the official macroeconomic and fiscal forecasts produced by the executive.

The indicators on IFIs are not scored in the Open Budget Survey.

Methodology

Only documents published and events, activities, or developments that took place through 31 December 2024 were assessed in the OBS 2025.
 
The survey is based on a questionnaire completed in each country by an independent budget expert:
Marjan Nikolov and Vesna Garvanlieva Andonova
Center for Economic Analyses
Bul. Jane Sandanski 63/3, 1000 Skopje; http://www.cea.org.mk/
info@cea.org.mk 
Past reports
Years
Language
Country summary EN
PDF, en
Questionnaire EN
PDF, en
Country summary MK
PDF, mk
Country summary EN
PDF, en
Questionnaire EN
PDF, en
Country summary MK
PDF, mk
Country summary EN
PDF, en
Questionnaire EN
PDF, en
Country summary MK
PDF, mk
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN