Country Results  | View this page in:

Brazil

Which countries lead in budget accountability? Which ones need improvement? Explore our data and recommendations for each of the 125 countries assessed.
Open Budget Survey Results

Public Participation

17

Budget Oversight

83

Transparency

80

Open Budget Survey 2023

Government budget decisions – what taxes to levy, what services to provide, and how much debt to take on – have important consequences for all people in society. When governments provide information and meaningful channels for the public to engage in these decisions, we can better ensure public money is spent on public interests.

Read more

 

The Open Budget Survey (OBS) is the world’s only independent, comparative and fact-based research instrument that uses internationally accepted criteria to assess public access to central government budget information; formal opportunities for the public to participate in the national budget process; and the role of budget oversight institutions, such as legislatures and national audit offices, in the budget process.

The survey helps local civil society assess and confer with their government on the reporting and use of public funds. This 9th edition of the OBS covers 125 countries.

Summary
Country Specific Assessments
Country summary EN
pdf, 236.52 KB
Questionnaire EN
pdf, 1018.07 KB
80 /100

This part of the OBS measures public access to information on how the central government raises and spends public resources. It assesses the online availability, timeliness, and comprehensiveness of eight key budget documents using 109 equally weighted indicators and scores each country on a scale of 0 to 100. A transparency score of 61 or above indicates a country is likely publishing enough material to support informed public debate on the budget.

Transparency in Brazil compared to others

Global Average
45
Mexico
80
Brazil
80
Peru
71
Argentina
51
Colombia
50
Paraguay
48
Bolivia
11
0
Insufficient
61
Sufficient
100

Brazil’s ranking: 7 of 125 countries

0
100

How has the transparency score for Brazil changed over time?

73
2012
77
2015
77
2017
81
2019
80
2021
80
2023
0
Insufficient
61
Sufficient
100

Public availability of budget documents in Brazil

Key
Available to the Public
Published Late, or Not Published Online, or Produced for Internal Use Only
Not Produced
Scroll
Document 2012 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023
Pre-Budget Statement
Executive’s Budget Proposal
Enacted Budget
Citizens Budget
In-Year Reports
Mid-Year Review
Year-End Report
Audit Report

How comprehensive is the content of the key budget documents that Brazil makes available to the public?

Key
61-100 / 100
41-60 / 100
1-40 / 100
Scroll
Key budget document Document purpose and contents Fiscal year assessed Document content score
Pre-Budget Statement Discloses the broad parameters of fiscal policies in advance of the Executive's Budget Proposal; outlines the government's economic forecast, anticipated revenue, expenditures, and debt. 2023 84
Executive’s Budget Proposal Submitted by the executive to the legislature for approval; details the sources of revenue, the allocations to ministries, proposed policy changes, and other information important for understanding the country's fiscal situation. 2023 74
Enacted Budget The budget that has been approved by the legislature. 2022 89
Citizens Budget A simpler and less technical version of the government's Executive’s Budget Proposal or the Enacted Budget, designed to convey key information to the public. 2023 58
In-Year Reports Include information on actual revenues collected, actual expenditures made, and debt incurred at different intervals; issued quarterly or monthly. 2022 100
Mid-Year Review A comprehensive update on the implementation of the budget as of the middle of the fiscal year; includes a review of economic assumptions and an updated forecast of budget outcomes. 2022 70
Year-End Report Describes the situation of the government's accounts at the end of the fiscal year and, ideally, an evaluation of the progress made toward achieving the budget's policy goals. 2021 88
Audit Report Issued by the supreme audit institution, this document examines the soundness and completeness of the government's year-end accounts. 2021 100

Brazil’s transparency score of 80 in the OBS 2023 is largely the same as its score in 2021.

Recommendations

Brazil should prioritize the following actions to improve budget transparency:

Expand on the participatory nature of the Citizens Budget, for example by identifying the public's requirements for budget information prior to the release of the document and ensuring that “citizens” versions of budget documents are published throughout the budget cycle.
17 /100

The OBS assesses the formal opportunities offered to the public for meaningful participation in the different stages of the budget process. It examines the practices of the central government’s executive, the legislature, and the supreme audit institution (SAI) using 18 equally weighted indicators, aligned with the Global Initiative for Fiscal Transparency’s Principles of Public Participation in Fiscal Policies , and scores each country on a scale from 0 to 100.

Brazil has a public participation score of 17 (out of 100).

Public participation in Brazil compared to others

Global Average
15
Peru
35
Mexico
30
Colombia
20
Brazil
17
Argentina
17
Bolivia
15
Paraguay
9
0
Insufficient
61
Sufficient
100

For more information, see here  for innovative public participation practices around the world.

Extent of opportunities for public participation in the budget process

0
/100
Formulation
(executive)
11
/100
Approval
(legislature)
0
/100
Implementation
(executive)
78
/100
Audit
(supreme audit institution)
Key
0-40: Few
41-60: Limited
61-100: Adequate

Recommendations

To further strengthen public participation in the budget process, Brazil's Ministério do Planejamento e Orçamento should prioritize the following actions:

Introduce mechanisms to engage the public during budget formulation and to monitor budget implementation, particularly by respecting the legal mandate of the Public Policies Councils and including them in the budget formulation and execution debate.
Actively engage with vulnerable and underrepresented communities, directly or through civil society organizations representing them.

Brazil's Congresso Nacional has established public hearings related to the approval of the annual budget, but should also prioritize the following actions:

Enhance public participation on budget during public hearings by establishing dedicated spaces on official digital platforms at a minimum.
Debate the annual budget in all national councils that have civil society representatives, specially the councils that are responsible for climate change policies.
Allow any member of the public or any civil society organization to testify during its hearings on the budget proposal prior to its approval.
Allow members of the public or civil society organizations to testify during its hearings on the Audit Report.
83 /100

The OBS examines the role that legislatures and supreme audit institutions (SAIs) play in the budget process and the extent to which they provide oversight; each country is scored on a scale from 0 to 100 based on 18 equally weighted indicators. In addition, the survey collects supplementary information on independent fiscal institutions (see Box).

The legislature and supreme audit institution in Brazil, together, provide adequate oversight during the budget process, with a composite oversight score of 83 (out of 100). Taken individually, the extent of each institution’s oversight is shown below:

Legislative oversight

0
81
100
adequate

Audit oversight

0
89
100
adequate
Key
0-40: Few
41-60: Limited
61-100: Adequate

Recommendations

Brazil's Congresso Nacional provides adequate oversight during the planning stage of the budget cycle and adequate oversight during the implementation stage. To further improve oversight, the following actions should be prioritized:

A legislative committee should examine in-year budget implementation and publish reports with their findings online.
In practice, ensure the legislature is consulted before the executive reduces spending due to revenue shortfalls.

To strengthen independence and improve audit oversight by the Brazil Tribunal de Contas da União, the following actions are recommended:

Ensure audit processes are reviewed by an independent agency.

The emerging practice of establishing independent fiscal institutions

Brazil’s independent fiscal institution (IFI) is the Instituição Fiscal Independente. Its independence is set in law, and it reports to the legislature. It publishes its own macroeconomic and fiscal forecasts, and its own cost estimates of major new policy proposals.

The indicators on IFIs are not scored in the Open Budget Survey.

Methodology

Only documents published and events, activities, or developments that took place through 31 December 2022 were assessed in the OBS 2023.
 
The survey is based on a questionnaire completed in each country by an independent budget expert:

For inquiries please contact the International Budget Partnership

[email protected]
To further strengthen the research, each country’s draft questionnaire is also reviewed by an anonymous independent expert, and in Brazil by a representative of the Ministério do Planejamento e Orçamento and by a representative of the Tribunal de Contas da União.
Past reports
Years
Language
Country summary EN
PDF, en
Questionnaire EN
PDF, en
Country summary PT
PDF, pt
Country summary EN
PDF, en
Questionnaire EN
PDF, en
Country summary PT
PDF, pt
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary PT
PDF, PT
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Country summary PT
PDF, PT
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary PT
PDF, PT
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Country summary PT
PDF, PT
Country summary CN
PDF, CN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Country summary PT
PDF, PT
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary PT
PDF, PT