United Kingdom

Which countries lead in budget accountability? Which ones need improvement? Explore our data and recommendations for each of the 125 countries assessed.
Open Budget Survey Results

Public Participation

54

Budget Oversight

56

Transparency

62

Open Budget Survey 2023

Government budget decisions – what taxes to levy, what services to provide, and how much debt to take on – have important consequences for all people in society. When governments provide information and meaningful channels for the public to engage in these decisions, we can better ensure public money is spent on public interests.

Read more

 

The Open Budget Survey (OBS) is the world’s only independent, comparative and fact-based research instrument that uses internationally accepted criteria to assess public access to central government budget information; formal opportunities for the public to participate in the national budget process; and the role of budget oversight institutions, such as legislatures and national audit offices, in the budget process.

The survey helps local civil society assess and confer with their government on the reporting and use of public funds. This 9th edition of the OBS covers 125 countries.

Summary
Country Specific Assessments
Country summary EN
pdf, 237.06 KB
Questionnaire EN
pdf, 954.25 KB
62 /100

This part of the OBS measures public access to information on how the central government raises and spends public resources. It assesses the online availability, timeliness, and comprehensiveness of eight key budget documents using 109 equally weighted indicators and scores each country on a scale of 0 to 100. A transparency score of 61 or above indicates a country is likely publishing enough material to support informed public debate on the budget.

Transparency in United Kingdom compared to others

Global Average
45
OECD Average
67
Sweden
85
Norway
80
Italy
76
Germany
76
Canada
74
United States
69
Portugal
62
United Kingdom
62
Spain
54
0
Insufficient
61
Sufficient
100

United Kingdom’s ranking: 36 of 125 countries

0
100

How has the transparency score for United Kingdom changed over time?

88
2012
75
2015
74
2017
70
2019
74
2021
62
2023
0
Insufficient
61
Sufficient
100

Public availability of budget documents in United Kingdom

Key
Available to the Public
Published Late, or Not Published Online, or Produced for Internal Use Only
Not Produced
Scroll
Document 2012 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023
Pre-Budget Statement
Executive’s Budget Proposal
Enacted Budget
Citizens Budget
In-Year Reports
Mid-Year Review
Year-End Report
Audit Report

How comprehensive is the content of the key budget documents that United Kingdom makes available to the public?

Key
61-100 / 100
41-60 / 100
1-40 / 100
Scroll
Key budget document Document purpose and contents Fiscal year assessed Document content score
Pre-Budget Statement Discloses the broad parameters of fiscal policies in advance of the Executive's Budget Proposal; outlines the government's economic forecast, anticipated revenue, expenditures, and debt. 2022-23 Not Produced
Executive’s Budget Proposal Submitted by the executive to the legislature for approval; details the sources of revenue, the allocations to ministries, proposed policy changes, and other information important for understanding the country's fiscal situation. 2022-23 70
Enacted Budget The budget that has been approved by the legislature. 2022-23 22
Citizens Budget A simpler and less technical version of the government's Executive’s Budget Proposal or the Enacted Budget, designed to convey key information to the public. 2022-23 Not Produced
In-Year Reports Include information on actual revenues collected, actual expenditures made, and debt incurred at different intervals; issued quarterly or monthly. 2022-23 93
Mid-Year Review A comprehensive update on the implementation of the budget as of the middle of the fiscal year; includes a review of economic assumptions and an updated forecast of budget outcomes. 2022-23 85
Year-End Report Describes the situation of the government's accounts at the end of the fiscal year and, ideally, an evaluation of the progress made toward achieving the budget's policy goals. 2021-22 69
Audit Report Issued by the supreme audit institution, this document examines the soundness and completeness of the government's year-end accounts. 2020-21 Internal Use

United Kingdom’s transparency score of 62 in the OBS 2023 is substantially lower than its score in 2021.

What changed in OBS 2023?

United Kingdom has decreased the availability of budget information by:

Producing the Audit Report for internal use only.
Failing to produce the Pre-Budget Statement.

Recommendations

United Kingdom should prioritize the following actions to improve budget transparency:

Publish the Audit Report online in a timely manner.
Produce and publish the Pre-Budget Statement and Citizens Budget online in a timely manner.
Improve the comprehensiveness of the Enacted Budget by including a presentation of expenditures by functional and economic classifications, as well as by individual program.
54 /100

The OBS assesses the formal opportunities offered to the public for meaningful participation in the different stages of the budget process. It examines the practices of the central government’s executive, the legislature, and the supreme audit institution (SAI) using 18 equally weighted indicators, aligned with the Global Initiative for Fiscal Transparency’s Principles of Public Participation in Fiscal Policies , and scores each country on a scale from 0 to 100.

United Kingdom has a public participation score of 54 (out of 100).

Public participation in United Kingdom compared to others

Global Average
15
OECD Average
24
United Kingdom
54
Portugal
28
Canada
26
Norway
24
United States
22
Sweden
18
Germany
17
Italy
15
Spain
2
0
Insufficient
61
Sufficient
100

For more information, see here  for innovative public participation practices around the world.

Extent of opportunities for public participation in the budget process

47
/100
Formulation
(executive)
44
/100
Approval
(legislature)
25
/100
Implementation
(executive)
89
/100
Audit
(supreme audit institution)
Key
0-40: Few
41-60: Limited
61-100: Adequate

Recommendations

United Kingdom's Treasury has established pre-budget submissions during budget formulation and e-consultations during budget implementation but, to further strengthen public participation in the budget process, should also prioritize the following actions:

Expand mechanisms during budget implementation to engage any civil society organization or member of the public who wishes to participate.
Actively engage with vulnerable and underrepresented communities, directly or through civil society organizations representing them.

United Kingdom's Parliament has established public hearings related to the approval of the annual budget and public hearings and submissions related to the review of the Audit Report, but should also prioritize the following actions:

Allow any member of the public or any civil society organization to testify during its hearings on the budget proposal prior to its approval.
56 /100

The OBS examines the role that legislatures and supreme audit institutions (SAIs) play in the budget process and the extent to which they provide oversight; each country is scored on a scale from 0 to 100 based on 18 equally weighted indicators. In addition, the survey collects supplementary information on independent fiscal institutions (see Box).

The legislature and supreme audit institution in United Kingdom, together, provide limited oversight during the budget process, with a composite oversight score of 56 (out of 100). Taken individually, the extent of each institution’s oversight is shown below:

Legislative oversight

0
33
100
weak

Audit oversight

0
100
100
adequate
Key
0-40: Few
41-60: Limited
61-100: Adequate

Recommendations

United Kingdom's Parliament provided weak oversight during the planning stage of the budget cycle and limited oversight during the implementation stage, owing to an atypical political context and budget cycle in 2022. To improve oversight, the following actions should be prioritized:

The Executive’s Budget Proposal should be submitted to legislators at least two months before the start of the budget year.
Legislative committees should examine the Executive’s Budget Proposal and publish reports with their analysis online.
The legislature should approve the Executive’s Budget Proposal before the start of the budget year.
A legislative committee should examine in-year budget implementation and publish reports with their findings online.
In practice, ensure the legislature is consulted before the executive reduces spending due to revenue shortfalls.

The emerging practice of establishing independent fiscal institutions

United Kingdom’s independent fiscal institution (IFI) is the Office for Budget Responsibility. Its independence is set in law, and it reports to the Executive and to Parliament. It publishes its own macroeconomic and fiscal forecasts, and its own cost estimates of all new policy proposals.

The indicators on IFIs are not scored in the Open Budget Survey.

Methodology

Only documents published and events, activities, or developments that took place through 31 December 2022 were assessed in the OBS 2023.
 
The survey is based on a questionnaire completed in each country by an independent budget expert:
Elizabeth Pimentel
U.K. Women's Budget Group

To further strengthen the research, each country’s draft questionnaire is also reviewed by an anonymous independent expert, and in United Kingdom by a representative of the Treasury.
Past reports
Years
Language
Country summary EN
PDF, en
Questionnaire EN
PDF, en
Country summary EN
PDF, en
Questionnaire EN
PDF, en
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
OBIUnitedKingdom
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary CN
PDF, CN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Country summary FR
PDF, FR
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN