Country Results  | View this page in:

Venezuela

Which countries lead in budget accountability? Which ones need improvement? Explore our data and recommendations for each of the 125 countries assessed.
Open Budget Survey Results

Public Participation

0

Budget Oversight

28

Transparency

0

Open Budget Survey 2023

Government budget decisions – what taxes to levy, what services to provide, and how much debt to take on – have important consequences for all people in society. When governments provide information and meaningful channels for the public to engage in these decisions, we can better ensure public money is spent on public interests.

Read more

 

The Open Budget Survey (OBS) is the world’s only independent, comparative and fact-based research instrument that uses internationally accepted criteria to assess public access to central government budget information; formal opportunities for the public to participate in the national budget process; and the role of budget oversight institutions, such as legislatures and national audit offices, in the budget process.

The survey helps local civil society assess and confer with their government on the reporting and use of public funds. This 9th edition of the OBS covers 125 countries.

Summary
Country Specific Assessments
Country summary EN
pdf, 239.04 KB
Questionnaire EN
pdf, 1.02 MB
0 /100

This part of the OBS measures public access to information on how the central government raises and spends public resources. It assesses the online availability, timeliness, and comprehensiveness of eight key budget documents using 109 equally weighted indicators and scores each country on a scale of 0 to 100. A transparency score of 61 or above indicates a country is likely publishing enough material to support informed public debate on the budget.

Transparency in Venezuela compared to others

Global Average
45
Brazil
80
Peru
71
Chile
60
Argentina
51
Colombia
50
Paraguay
48
Ecuador
48
Bolivia
11
Venezuela
0
0
Insufficient
61
Sufficient
100

Venezuela’s ranking: 123 of 125 countries

0
100

How has the transparency score for Venezuela changed over time?

37
2012
8
2015
0
2017
0
2019
0
2021
0
2023
0
Insufficient
61
Sufficient
100

Public availability of budget documents in Venezuela

Key
Available to the Public
Published Late, or Not Published Online, or Produced for Internal Use Only
Not Produced
Scroll
Document 2012 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023
Pre-Budget Statement
Executive’s Budget Proposal
Enacted Budget
Citizens Budget
In-Year Reports
Mid-Year Review
Year-End Report
Audit Report

How comprehensive is the content of the key budget documents that Venezuela makes available to the public?

Key
61-100 / 100
41-60 / 100
1-40 / 100
Scroll
Key budget document Document purpose and contents Fiscal year assessed Document content score
Pre-Budget Statement Discloses the broad parameters of fiscal policies in advance of the Executive's Budget Proposal; outlines the government's economic forecast, anticipated revenue, expenditures, and debt. 2023 Internal Use
Executive’s Budget Proposal Submitted by the executive to the legislature for approval; details the sources of revenue, the allocations to ministries, proposed policy changes, and other information important for understanding the country's fiscal situation. 2023 Internal Use
Enacted Budget The budget that has been approved by the legislature. 2022 Internal Use
Citizens Budget A simpler and less technical version of the government's Executive’s Budget Proposal or the Enacted Budget, designed to convey key information to the public. 2023 Not Produced
In-Year Reports Include information on actual revenues collected, actual expenditures made, and debt incurred at different intervals; issued quarterly or monthly. 2022 Not Produced
Mid-Year Review A comprehensive update on the implementation of the budget as of the middle of the fiscal year; includes a review of economic assumptions and an updated forecast of budget outcomes. 2022 Not Produced
Year-End Report Describes the situation of the government's accounts at the end of the fiscal year and, ideally, an evaluation of the progress made toward achieving the budget's policy goals. 2021 Internal Use
Audit Report Issued by the supreme audit institution, this document examines the soundness and completeness of the government's year-end accounts. 2020 Not Produced

Venezuela’s transparency score of 0 in the OBS 2023 is largely the same as its score in 2021.

Recommendations

Venezuela should prioritize the following actions to improve budget transparency:

The Ministerio del Poder Popular de Economía, Finanzas y Comercio
Exterior should publish the Pre-Budget Statement, Executive's Budget Proposal, Enacted Budget and Year-End Report online in a timely manner.
The Ministerio del Poder Popular de Economía, Finanzas y Comercio
Exterior should produce and publish the Citizens Budget, In-Year Reports, and Mid-Year Review online in a timely manner.
The Ministerio del Poder Popular de Economía, Finanzas y Comercio Exterior should publish information about public debt and existing extrabudgetary funds.
The Contraloría General de la República should produce and publish the Audit Report online in a timely manner.
0 /100

The OBS assesses the formal opportunities offered to the public for meaningful participation in the different stages of the budget process. It examines the practices of the central government’s executive, the legislature, and the supreme audit institution (SAI) using 18 equally weighted indicators, aligned with the Global Initiative for Fiscal Transparency’s Principles of Public Participation in Fiscal Policies , and scores each country on a scale from 0 to 100.

Venezuela has a public participation score of 0 (out of 100).

Public participation in Venezuela compared to others

Global Average
15
Peru
35
Colombia
20
Ecuador
20
Argentina
17
Brazil
17
Bolivia
15
Chile
11
Paraguay
9
Venezuela
0
0
Insufficient
61
Sufficient
100

For more information, see here  for innovative public participation practices around the world.

Extent of opportunities for public participation in the budget process

0
/100
Formulation
(executive)
0
/100
Approval
(legislature)
0
/100
Implementation
(executive)
0
/100
Audit
(supreme audit institution)
Key
0-40: Few
41-60: Limited
61-100: Adequate

Recommendations

To further strengthen public participation in the budget process, Venezuela's
Ministerio del Poder Popular de Economía, Finanzas y Comercio Exterior should prioritize the following actions:

Pilot mechanisms to engage the public during budget formulation and to monitor budget implementation.
Actively engage with vulnerable and underrepresented communities, directly or through civil society organizations representing them.

Venezuela's Asamblea Nacional should prioritize the following actions:

Allow any member of the public or civil society organizations to testify during its hearings on the budget proposal prior to its approval. Furthermore, ensure that National Assembly discussions adhere to a public schedule, providing ample opportunity for participation from the public and civil society organizations.
Upon the Contraloría General de la República's production and submission of the Audit Report to parliament, parliament should ensure that members of the public or civil society organizations can testify during its hearings on the Audit Report.

Venezuela's Contraloría General de la República should prioritize the following actions to improve public participation in the budget process:

Building upon the recommendation to produce and publish the Audit Report, the Contraloría General de la República should also establish formal mechanisms allowing the public to assist in developing its audit program and to contribute to relevant audit investigations.
28 /100

The OBS examines the role that legislatures and supreme audit institutions (SAIs) play in the budget process and the extent to which they provide oversight; each country is scored on a scale from 0 to 100 based on 18 equally weighted indicators. In addition, the survey collects supplementary information on independent fiscal institutions (see Box).

The legislature and supreme audit institution in Venezuela, together, provide weak oversight during the budget process, with a composite oversight score of 28 (out of 100). Taken individually, the extent of each institution’s oversight is shown below:

Legislative oversight

0
28
100
weak

Audit oversight

0
28
100
weak
Key
0-40: Few
41-60: Limited
61-100: Adequate

Recommendations

Venezuela's Asamblea Nacional provides weak oversight during the planning stage of the budget cycle and weak oversight during the implementation stage. To improve oversight, the following actions should be prioritized:

The legislature should debate budget policy before the Executive’s Budget Proposal is tabled and approve recommendations for the upcoming budget.
Legislative committees should examine the Executive’s Budget Proposal and publish reports with their analysis online.
A legislative committee from the Asamblea Nacional should follow up on the execution of the budget, provided that the executive produces and publishes the In-Year Reports and the Year-End Report on time, and the Contraloría General de la República delivers the Audit Report.

In practice, ensure the legislature is consulted before the executive shifts funds specified in the Enacted Budget between administrative units; spends any unanticipated revenue; or reduces spending due to revenue shortfalls during the budget year.
A legislative committee should examine the Audit Report and publish a report with their findings online.

To strengthen independence and improve audit oversight by the Venezuela Contraloría General de la República, the following actions are recommended:

Require legislative or judicial approval to appoint and remove the head of the supreme audit institution.
Ensure the supreme audit institution has adequate funding to perform its duties, as determined by an independent body (e.g., the legislature or judiciary).
Ensure audit processes are reviewed by an independent agency.

The emerging practice of establishing independent fiscal institutions

Venezuela does not have an independent fiscal institution (IFI). IFIs are increasingly recognized as valuable independent and nonpartisan information providers to the Executive and/or Parliament during the budget process.

*These indicators are *not* scored in the Open Budget Survey.

Methodology

Only documents published and events, activities, or developments that took place through 31 December 2022 were assessed in the OBS 2023.
 
The survey is based on a questionnaire completed in each country by an independent budget expert:
Christi Rangel Guerrero
Transparencia Venezuela
Avda. Andrés Bello con 1ra. Transversal, Edif. Multicentro Los Palos Grandes, Piso 6, Chacao, Caracas
[email protected]
To further strengthen the research, each country’s draft questionnaire is also reviewed by an anonymous independent expert.
Past reports
Years
Language
Country summary EN
PDF, en
Questionnaire EN
PDF, en
Country summary ES
PDF, es
Country summary EN
PDF, en
Questionnaire EN
PDF, en
Country summary ES
PDF, es
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary ES
PDF, ES
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary ES
PDF, ES
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary ES
PDF, ES
Country summary ES
PDF, ES
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Questionnaire EN
PDF, EN
Country summary EN
PDF, EN
Country summary ES
PDF, ES